Your browser may not support display of this image.




Education Evaluation Report 2008 - 2009





Executive Summary

The 2008-2009 VSA Arts of Massachusetts (VSAM) educational programming served students who are currently underserved in the arts, cultivated 21st Century Skills for students, fostered collaborative relationships within Artist Residency partnerships, and educated professional learning communities to use the arts as a tool for Universal Design for Learning.  VSAM identified the need to increase parental involvement opportunities during Artist Residencies.  Doing so will ensure that students are receiving meaningful, inclusive, high quality arts learning opportunities.

Data was collected from 28 of our 2008-2009 Artist Residency Programs and 3 of our professional development opportunities.  We collected data using Planning Forms, Curriculum Maps, a collection of annotated student work, conversations from the Community of Practice website, and participant surveys from our Artist Residency and Professional Development programs.  Understanding the interrelationship between the school, classroom, student, and professional development communities provided a rich source of data integral to our evaluation methods.

Evaluation Methods

VSAM used the 2008-2009 data from Artist Residencies and Professional Development opportunities to reflect upon three of our goals for this year:

1. Facilitate a partnership between school administrators and VSAM education staff so that a positive impact is made on school communities.

2. Inform educators how the arts can provide multiple options for students and teachers to represent, express, and engage with academic content in order to create a positive impact on classroom communities.

3. Ensure that individual students are provided with a meaningful, inclusive, and high quality arts experience as a result of participating in one of our Artist Residency programs.

This evaluation report describes the impact that VSAM has had on the school communities, classrooms, individual students, and professional learning communities who have received our programming.  The data for this report was collected from 32 teacher post-residency surveys, 8 artist post-residency surveys, and 8 principal surveys that represent 19 of our 22 schools.  We also gathered data from the Planning Forms, Curriculum Maps, and student work from all 22 partner schools.  Qualitative data was collected from conversations documented on the VSAM Communities of Practice website as well as informal conversations with participants.

VSAM Education Programs provided arts learning opportunities for students in Pre-Kindergarten through 12th grade across the state of Massachusetts.  Elementary aged students were the recipients of a majority of our programming with High School aged students representing the second greatest population who received our programming.  At this time Pre-K and Middle School populations received the least amount of our programming in comparison to other populations.

Your browser may not support display of this image.

Impact on School Communities

This year the Boston Foundation and EdVestors supported a study, The Arts Advantage, that found "schools with larger percentages of Special Education students among their student body reported lower percentages of students receiving arts education.  Similarly, schools with large percentages of Special Education students reported offering fewer art disciplines than those schools with smaller percentages of Special Education students."   This finding reinforces the mission of VSAM Education Programs: To provide equitable access to high quality arts education programs for students with and without disabilities.  In addition, the finding identifies an immediate need for more resources to be invested in high quality arts programming specifically designed to benefit all students -- including students who receive Special Education services in Boston.  The graph below shows the percentage of students receiving special education services in each of our partner schools.  Many of them exceed the district average.

A study included in Critical Links, noted that, "arts infused classrooms and arts instruction positively affect the learning, engagement and performance of special needs students and students from low-income backgrounds." (Catterall &Waldorf, 2002).  68% of the schools we partner with qualify for Title I funding.+

Your browser may not support display of this image.

The findings from the Arts Advantage Report and Critical Links study combined with the demographic information from our partner schools confirm the need for VSAM to continue to:

VSAM hopes to improve the access of underserved populations to quality arts learning opportunities through our education programs.

Your browser may not support display of this image.

School Community Outcomes

Information from eight principal surveys helped us to understand the impact of the artist residency programs within the whole school community.  The comments from principals suggest that the artists have helped to support individual school missions, Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks, inclusive strategies, and arts integration practices.  The graph below illustrates the feedback from principals.

One area of need that VSAM has identified is parent engagement.  We have outlined a strategy to address this need in the Learnings and Next Steps section of the report.

Your browser may not support display of this image.

Impact on Classroom Communities

VSAM Education staff work to ensure that a strong collaboration is formed between each teacher and VSAM teaching artist thus creating a rich classroom community.  Teachers have content objectives and specific learning goals for individual students, while artists have aesthetic objectives and specific arts learning goals for individual students.  Each collaborator contributes unique skills to the classroom community that ultimately impacts individual students through the learning opportunities that are designed.

Planning Forms, Curriculum Maps, and documentation of student work were analyzed so that teacher and artist objectives were aligned and both areas of expertise were reflected in the curriculum.  The formation of this strong collaboration was integral to achieving our second goal:

2. Inform educators how the arts can provide multiple options for students and teachers to represent, express, and engage with academic content in order to create a positive impact on classroom communities.

We analyzed data from teacher post-residency surveys, artist post-residency surveys, and post-Contours of Inclusion conference surveys (a day long professional development conference held this year) in order to measure our success at forming strong collaborations.*

Learning Opportunities in the Classroom

The teacher and artist in each residency collaborated towards a curriculum goal that could be taught through the arts.  We asked teachers if they felt that their classroom goals were incorporated into the artists' lessons.  93.8% of teachers responded "Strongly Agree" (56.3%) or "Agree" (37.5%) that their classroom goals were incorporated into the artist's activities.

We also asked teachers, "What was the learning goal you and the artist collaborated towards during this residency?" to gain an idea of the curriculum connections made in each of the residency programs.  In order to see how the curriculum connections supported the development of 21st Century Skills we coded the teacher responses according to 21st Century Themes.

The 21st Century Skills Framework, developed by the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, provides VSAM with a system of language that is meaningful to the mission of our organization and reflects the current dialect that educational policy makers use when speaking about the future of education in the Commonwealth.  Thinking about our work within this framework provides VSAM with deeper insight into the type of work we do and how it benefits those that we serve.

The graph below illustrates the 21st Century Themes that our 2008-2009 Artist Residencies supported.

Below is an example of how responses were coded: